Follow the Daily Bruin's coverage of Skirball fire. 

Sunday, December 17

Student leaders react to UCLA administration’s response to fire


UCLA canceled Thursday  classes because of a fire burning in the Bel-Air area near UCLA. Several student leaders have said they think UCLA did not properly respond to the fire. (Michael Zshornack/Daily Bruin)

UCLA canceled Thursday classes because of a fire burning in the Bel-Air area near UCLA. Several student leaders have said they think UCLA did not properly respond to the fire. (Michael Zshornack/Daily Bruin)


This post was updated Dec. 7 at 1:10 p.m.

Some student leaders said they think the UCLA administration’s response to the Skirball fire was inefficient and that the decision to cancel Thursday classes could have been made earlier.

The fire, originating near the I-405 Freeway around 4 a.m., burned through Bel-Air on Wednesday, prompting the university to cancel all classes that began on or after noon. An initial BruinAlert released at 4:44 p.m. Wednesday said normal courses and on-campus services would resume Thursday. However, a later BruinAlert, released after midnight, indicated classes would be canceled Thursday.

UCLA canceled classes to allow officials to assess logistical issues prior to finals week, according to a university statement. The statement added the campus is safe and is outside the evacuation area.

Graduate Students Association President Michael Skiles said he thinks the administration cancelled Thursday classes in response to student petitions and plans for a “Stay-In Protest.” The USAC Academic Affairs office is encouraging students not to attend class until air conditions improve.

“The alerts were sent out late because (students) made it apparent to the university that it wouldn’t be productive to risk having classes today,” Skiles said.

The Undergraduate Students Association Council and Graduate Students Association also collected student signatures Wednesday night for a letter calling on the administration to cancel classes until conditions from the fire are stabilized, accommodate students who have finals this week and review its emergency management procedures. The letter had received 7,589 signatures as of Thursday morning, Skiles said.

Skiles said BruinAlerts sent in the morning that stated faculty and staff should report to work if possible were vague and could have pressured some faculty to report to work despite health and safety concerns.

“Some faculty supervisors will read that alert and interpret it differently and ask (teaching assistants) to come to work today … while other faculty that work with research in a lab might require all student staff to come to work,” Skiles said.

Skiles said he thinks the BruinAlert system did not effectively communicate timely information to students. The alert indicating that Wednesday’s afternoon classes would be canceled was released at about 11 a.m.

“The whole point of canceling classes is so students didn’t have to come to campus, in spite of the 405 being closed or walking through the smoke-filled Westwood,” Skiles said.

Divya Sharma, Academic Affairs commissioner, said he thinks the university is not prepared to handle emergency situations because the BruinAlert canceling classes went out after many students were already on campus.

“We’ve seen a shooting happen on campus, where administration did not respond quickly to the needs of students,” Sharma said. “And with the fire happening, there is no emergency preparedness.”

Sharma added he thinks the alerts should have included information to better prepare students for an evacuation and how to stay safe from the fire.

Nathan Glovinsky, one of the undergraduate student representatives on the 2016 Campus Safety Task Force, which was established after the shooting in June 2016 to better prepare UCLA for emergency situations, said he thinks students should not be put in a position to choose between their grades, safety and mental health.

Glovinsky, a third-year history student, added he thinks the university’s responses to emergency situations communicated through BruinAlert should offer more flexibility for students who choose to take additional precautionary measures for their health or safety.

“In the BruinAlerts, we never really received an acknowledgement that if students wanted to evacuate personally, that there would be no penalty,” he said. “A lot of students were uncomfortable … doing anything because they didn’t want to leave campus and face an academic penalty.”

UPDATES:

1:10 p.m.: This article was updated with comments from Skiles and Sharma.

This article was originally published on Dec. 6 at 10:35 p.m.

 

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on Google+Share on Reddit

Kim is the assistant news editor for the campus politics beat. She was previously a contributor for the beat.


Comments are supposed to create a forum for thoughtful, respectful community discussion. Please be nice. View our full comments policy here.

  • LiberalsAreSensitiveBeings

    Snowflakes!

    • Lynette Hawkins

      The hills are on fire ok?

  • Lynette Hawkins

    My son came home this evening from UCLA to Covina. We expected classes to be cancelled for Thursday knowing the wind conditions are expected to worsen and danger to increase. An email came stating that classes would resume as usual tomorrow so my son is on his way back to the campus. I am not pleased with UCLA officials or this ridiculous alert system. In an hour or so my son will be back on campus and what…tomorrow morning an alert will be sent that classes are closed? I wish I could have made him stay home.

  • huskerfan

    Chancellor cancelled classes today.

  • Ritzie

    I mean, if you cancel classes, students could complain that the classes they’ve paid for have been canceled and not reimbursed. If the campus isn’t on fire, or in real danger of catching on fire, have class.

  • SinPatron

    What about the people who work there? People drive hours to come to work. Imagine having to consider your safety first v showing up to work. After the shooting and now the fire burning UCLA definitely showedd us that safety was not a priority.