Friday, March 29, 2024

AdvertiseDonateSubmit
NewsSportsArtsOpinionThe QuadPhotoVideoIllustrationsCartoonsGraphicsThe StackPRIMEEnterpriseInteractivesPodcastsBruinwalkClassifieds

Submission: USAC bylaw changes allow for better representation of student body

By Ian Cocroft and Heather Rosen

Dec. 3, 2015 7:05 p.m.

Each year, through democratic elections, thousands of UCLA students choose leaders whom they trust to better our campus and improve the Bruin experience. According to our constitution, the Undergraduate Students Association Council was established to “fairly represent student interest, needs, and welfare,” and “promote the general educational welfare” among other laudable goals.

One tool that USAC uses to accomplish those goals are resolutions – statements reflecting the unified opinion of the council on issues of interest to the student body. Prior to the bylaw amendment passed Nov. 17, however, the power of the council to pass resolutions was unlimited in both scope and duration. Without guidance on how long resolutions were to be in effect, and without a clear definition of a resolution, USAC had been free to speak on behalf of all present and future UCLA students on any issue – an expansive power that had the potential to silence students yet to come.

In order for the council to fairly represent students and promote general welfare, it became clear that the power of USAC would need to be limited in some manner. The preamble to our constitution offered guidance – the Undergraduate Students Association was established to “fairly represent student interest, needs, and welfare,” to express opinions on “issues affecting student life” and “to promote the general educational welfare.” We found it necessary and appropriate to define resolutions using the very language implemented in our guiding principles.

Language was proposed that would require resolutions to be expressly related to student welfare, in line with the purpose of our student government to express opinions on issues affecting student life specifically and to promote the general welfare. It should be noted that the Undergraduate Students Association was formed to promote the general welfare, not just the welfare of particular groups, and that we are supposed to “fairly represent” students, not prioritize some student voices over others. Some disagreed, and, as a compromise, we changed the amendment and decided that, at a minimum, our official statements of opinion – our resolutions – should not be permitted to harm members of our campus community. As student representatives, it is crucial that we consider the consequences of our words and actions beyond Kerckhoff 417.

We also decided to clarify that our words today do not define our campus tomorrow, that each and every council, and all future generations of Bruins, should have the right to find their own voice and speak for themselves. Clarifying that resolutions are the opinion of the current council allows resolutions to stand as powerful statements made by the student body at crucial moments in time – it does nothing to erase history.

The third amendment allows Council to suspend the bylaws with a two-thirds vote, rather than blatantly violating them, as past councils have done. Requiring a vote to suspend the bylaws ensures that our guiding documents are not violated arbitrarily, as was the norm in years past, a practice that had great potential for abuse.

It should be clear that these changes do not silence voices, erase history or give USAC sweeping new powers, as some alarmist rhetoric has claimed.

Those opposed to the amendment have argued that the 14 elected council members do not have the capacity or the right to represent the student body. They have said that unless our experiences or identities align perfectly with every student, we can only act on our own behalf. But that is not is not how a representative democracy functions.

The power to vote gives everyone the right to select leaders who they believe can best represent their point of view. In fact, one of the powers granted to USAC by our constitution is the power to act as the “official representation of the Association.” That power comes with the responsibility, however, to take the narratives and experiences of others into account while making decisions. As student representatives, this responsibility must be our top priority.

Resolutions are clearly an important aspect of student activism and student power, and we should work together to ensure that they bring our campus community together, empowering students rather than harming communities. And while USAC does have the power and responsibility to represent the student body, it is imperative that we strive for better representation, higher voter turnout and engagement in student government.

As representatives of almost 29,000 students, we must think critically about how our decisions affect our constituents. Of course every council member is entitled to their own set of beliefs, but as representatives and as servants of the greater student body we must consider how one comment, one vote, one decision will impact those around us.

Rosen is president of the Undergraduate Students Association Council and Cocroft is facilities commissioner of USAC.

Share this story:FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
Ian Cocroft
COMMENTS
Featured Classifieds
More classifieds »
Related Posts