Monday, May 25

No on Proposition 31

The editorial board is composed of multiple Daily Bruin staff members and is dedicated to publishing informed opinions on issues relevant to students. The board serves as the official voice of the paper and is separate from the newsroom.

Past the partisan bickering and campaign half-truths of the 2012 election season, it is integral that students take the initiative to educate themselves about the issues at stake on the November ballot.

The Daily Bruin editorial board, which represents the voice of the entire newspaper, has researched the measures and candidates that students will be voting on, and endorsed the ones we think do the most to support the UCLA community. We encourage students to use our endorsements as a starting point for conducting their own research, forming their own educated opinions and casting an informed vote come Election Day.

See who the board endorsed:

The people

The education propositions

The rest of the propositions

As a byproduct of tough economic times, constituents have raised complaints against California lawmakers over many issues. Proposition 31 tries to stick a few Band-Aids over the many calamities when what California really needs is a careful assessment of the state’s problems.

The measure attempts to implement nine changes to the state constitution regarding the power of the governor, large expenditures within the state budget, transparency procedures and the function of local government. These are certainly problems worth addressing, but we as a board are wary of a supposed fix-all.

Parts of the proposition make sense, such as the requirement to make all state bills public three days before approval and the mandate that any increase in state costs or decrease in state revenues of more than $25 million must be offset immediately in the budget.

Unfortunately, the pros of Proposition 31 are lumped together with many cons. Changing the state budget from a one-year to a two-year cycle makes little sense when California’s tax revenues can fluctuate drastically. Expanding the governor’s role is a power play that former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger last tried to pass on the 2005 ballot but failed. And the attempt to let counties operate autonomously is one this board does not support.

The measure is well-intentioned, but tries to do too much in a disjointed fashion. To stick this complicated and lengthy amendment in the state constitution would be unwise, especially with polling data that shows a large portion of the electorate is unsure of the proposition’s ramifications.

Comments are supposed to create a forum for thoughtful, respectful community discussion. Please be nice. View our full comments policy here.