Proposed “˜Laci and Connor’s Law’ a potential threat to abortion rights

As the murder trial of Laci Peterson continues, a controversial
piece of legislation has been reintroduced in Congress. “Laci
and Connor’s Law,” which would make the murder of a
pregnant woman punishable as a double homicide, is touted by some
as a victory for the rights of the unborn. But the legislation may
weaken women’s rights.

“Laci and Connor’s Law” is officially the
Unborn Victims of Violence Act. It was first introduced in the
House in 1999, and again in 2001. This summer is the first time the
bill has seen the Senate floor. Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.)
co-sponsor of the bill, said in a press release that it would
protect victims’ rights and not infringe on abortion
rights.

Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion,
would remain intact, but this proposed bill could be a stepping
stone for abortion-rights opponents looking to overturn the verdict
in the future by seeking to grant personhood to the fetus.

Brendan Benner, spokesman for Rep. Melissa Hart (R-Pa.), one of
the bill’s sponsors, said the bicameral bill would carry no
such consequence. Benner said the careful wording of the bill
protects women seeking an abortion, and it would be used only in
cases of abuse, assault or murder.

But can a fetus really be considered a person only in cases of
abuse and not abortion? Never mind the legal wrangling, it seems
unlikely that such a fine distinction can carry emotional weight on
such a highly charged issue.

Twenty-five states have already enacted similar laws.
“Laci and Connor’s Law” is the government’s
effort to make the laws similar in all 50 states. Proponents
believe this would benefit women and their families in cases like
Peterson’s as well as other instances of violence, including
terrorism. Unfortunately, it may also provide legal ground for
overturning Roe v. Wade.

Larimer is a student at University of Missouri,
Columbia.