USAC bipartisanship a good and a must
By Daily Bruin Staff
May 29, 2002 9:00 p.m.
EDITORIAL BOARD Editor in
Chief  Timothy Kudo
Managing Editor
 Michael Falcone
Viewpoint Editor
 Cuauhtemoc Ortega
Staff Representatives
 Maegan Carberry
 Edward Chiao
 Kelly Rayburn
Editorial Board Assistants
 Maegan Carberry
 Edward Chiao
  Unsigned editorials represent a majority opinion of
the Daily Bruin Editorial Board. All other columns, letters and
artwork represent the opinions of their authors. Â Â All
submitted material must bear the author’s name, address, telephone
number, registration number, or affiliation with UCLA. Names will
not be withheld except in extreme cases. Â Â The Bruin
complies with the Communication Board’s policy prohibiting the
publication of articles that perpetuate derogatory cultural or
ethnic stereotypes. Â Â When multiple authors submit
material, some names may be kept on file rather than published with
the material. The Bruin reserves the right to edit submitted
material and to determine its placement in the paper. All
submissions become the property of The Bruin. The Communications
Board has a media grievance procedure for resolving complaints
against any of its publications. For a copy of the complete
procedure, contact the Publications office at 118 Kerckhoff Hall.
Daily Bruin 118 Kerckhoff Hall 308 Westwood Plaza Los Angeles, CA
90024 (310) 825-9898
Christopher Neal, next year’s Undergraduate Student
Association Council external vice president and member of Student
Empowerment!, has been appointed to the Appointments Review
Committee, displaying promise that the SURE and Student
Empowerment! slates can work together to overcome partisan
politics. And with the balance of power split evenly between the
slates, USAC will need bipartisan cooperation to accomplish either
of their objectives next year.
The ARC is responsible for recommendations to the council
regarding whether commissioners’ nominees for appointments to
their departments should be approved. Since both slates will be
represented on the committee, hopefully bipartisan cooperation will
ensure fairness in appointments.
David Dahle’s mission in leading the SURE slate this year
was to achieve a more accurate representation of the student body.
While attempting this, though, he cannot forget that Student
Empowerment! does in fact represent a large portion of the student
body ““ to which the slight margin with which several SURE
candidates won their offices attests. If Student Empowerment!
voices are silenced, the student body as a whole will be no better
represented by SURE than it has been by Student Empowerment!.
With this in mind, Dahle should continue to appoint Student
Empowerment! members to important decision-making committees. SURE
and Student Empowerment! need to realize their agendas are not
mutually exclusive and continue this spirit of bipartisanship to
ensure a fair representation of the student body.
