House ban on soft money worthwhile

EDITORIAL BOARD Editor in
Chief  Timothy Kudo

Managing Editor
 Michael Falcone

Viewpoint Editor
 Cuauhtemoc Ortega

Staff Representatives
 Maegan Carberry
 Edward Chiao
 Kelly Rayburn

Editorial Board Assistants
 Maegan Carberry
 Edward Chiao

  Unsigned editorials represent a majority opinion of
the Daily Bruin Editorial Board. All other columns, letters and
artwork represent the opinions of their authors.   All
submitted material must bear the author’s name, address, telephone
number, registration number, or affiliation with UCLA. Names will
not be withheld except in extreme cases.   The Bruin
complies with the Communication Board’s policy prohibiting the
publication of articles that perpetuate derogatory cultural or
ethnic stereotypes.   When multiple authors submit
material, some names may be kept on file rather than published with
the material. The Bruin reserves the right to edit submitted
material and to determine its placement in the paper. All
submissions become the property of The Bruin. The Communications
Board has a media grievance procedure for resolving complaints
against any of its publications. For a copy of the complete
procedure, contact the Publications office at 118 Kerckhoff Hall.
Daily Bruin 118 Kerckhoff Hall 308 Westwood Plaza Los Angeles, CA
90024 (310) 825-9898

If any good can come from the collapse of energy giant Enron
Corp., it is the revival of the sorely needed campaign finance
reform bill which has stalled in the House of Representatives after
being passed in the Senate last year.

The bill will prevent big contributors like Enron from buying
political influence over candidates by banning “soft
money” ““ unregulated and unlimited financial
contributions to political parties during elections. The bill also
raises the limit on regulated contributions to individual
candidates to offset the impact on election budgets banning soft
money would have.

Enron gained incredible political influence through years of
generous campaign contributions ““ totalling more than $6
million over the past decade to both Democrats and Republicans. The
company’s political network can be traced throughout
Washington and this has called into question the type of influence
the corporation has had over politicians. This mingling of
politician and CEO threatens the integrity and fairness of the
American elections system, especially for candidates from smaller
parties or with less name recognition.

Banning soft money will work towards ensuring politicians
don’t determine their policy according to who pays their way
into office.