Friday, April 26, 2024

AdvertiseDonateSubmit
NewsSportsArtsOpinionThe QuadPhotoVideoIllustrationsCartoonsGraphicsThe StackPRIMEEnterpriseInteractivesPodcastsBruinwalkClassifieds

BREAKING:

UC Divest, SJP Encampment

Food Services looks for ways to augment performance

By Daily Bruin Staff

March 30, 1997 9:00 p.m.

Monday, March 31, 1997

ASUCLA:

Despite higher sales, division has not met budget projectionsBy
Frances Lee

Daily Bruin Contributor

It has the students’ association seeing red, and relief rests on
the tastes of 30,000 students.

Competition, from sack lunches to the 99-cent Whopper, overly
optimistic budget projections and the difficult task of satisfying
the needs of a diverse student population ­ all these factors
have contributed to the ASUCLA Food Services division’s poor
performance over the past six years.

And while food operations has failed to meet its projected
budget since 1991, there has been a steady increase in sales each
year.

The problem lies in "putting down what we wanted to achieve" in
food sales as opposed to what the association could realistically
expect, said ASUCLA Executive Director Patricia Eastman.

In 1992, for example, food sales totaled $13.6 million. For the
following year, the division’s budget was projected at $14.8
million. The actual performance in 1993 saw an increase of only
$51,000 over the previous year, falling $1.2 million short of the
projected budget.

The division’s constant failure to meet expectations in spite of
rising sales is cause for concern among many board members,
especially after a substantial investment in several new campus
eateries over the past few years.

Sales from Northern Lights, which opened last year, are $140,000
below the coffee shop’s projected budget for this year, while other
campus restaurants continue to lag behind the board’s
expectations.

But the new outlets’ performance shows that they need time to
find their niche, said ASUCLA Food Services Director Kert
Evans.

There is always room for improvement in terms of service and
menu options, which is why "Year One (totals) aren’t happening as
quickly as we’d hoped," he added.

Evans cited the Tropix juice and coffee bar in Ackerman Union as
an example. After two years of trial and error, "Tropix has hit its
stride and is improving. We believe Northern Lights, in another
year and a half, will be right on our projections," he said.

According to a market research survey performed in 1992,
quality, convenience and value were three main factors that
students considered when determining where to eat.

And according to some students, campus restaurants sometimes
don’t meet even these basic needs.

"The food’s OK for a college campus," said Diana Lee, a
fourth-year English student. "It does seem like a rip-off
sometimes, but what else can I do? I’ve got to eat."

This half-hearted enthusiasm for campus food is a sentiment
echoed by many students and board members alike, and it worries the
students’ association.

"This board is extremely frustrated by Food Services," said
board member Dave Kopplin.

ASUCLA Board of Directors Vice Chair Jim Friedman noted that
"we’re not raising prices, but we’ve introduced new, higher priced
items" ­ a problem that he wants to see resolved.

According to Evans, the price of a sample meal consisting of an
entree and drink has risen by an average of 2.8 percent per year
since 1990.

By comparison, the price for the same combination increased an
average of 3.8 percent per year over the same period in the Los
Angeles area, Evans said, placing ASUCLA food at a competitive
advantage over the surrounding community.

But even lower average prices can’t seem to make a dent in the
division’s performance.

"We have many items on the menu that are fairly priced, but
we’re fighting the 99-cent burger war," Evans said.

Increasing menu variety while trying to meet the student
population’s expectations is difficult, he added. While major
fast-food chains can lure customers in with free soda refills and
cutthroat prices, ASUCLA doesn’t have too many of the same options
if the board is to control costs and keep prices low, Evans
said.

At the moment, increasing customers and food quality is a top
priority for the board. Discounts, promotions and the adoption of
the ubiquitous "value meal" are all measures that the board is
considering in order to increase customer satisfaction and
service.

By this summer, ASUCLA hopes to have a new market research
survey completed in an effort to find out what customers want and
how to give it to them.

Share this story:FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
COMMENTS
Featured Classifieds
More classifieds »
Related Posts