Wednesday, October 17

Luskin Center releases Prop. 10-pertinent report on LA rent-control history


The Luskin Center for History and Policy released its first major publication Oct. 1. It details strategies to tackle the housing crisis in Los Angeles. (Daily Bruin file photo)

The Luskin Center for History and Policy released its first major publication Oct. 1. It details strategies to tackle the housing crisis in Los Angeles. (Daily Bruin file photo)


The UCLA Luskin Center for History and Policy released its first report, which details the history of rent-control policies in Los Angeles.

The report was released Oct. 1 and looks at three major periods in the history of the Los Angeles rental market. The paper focuses on federal rent control in the 1940s, citywide rent control in the late 1970s and today’s housing crisis. The report gives a historical perspective on the current housing crisis in Los Angeles, said David Myers, the center’s director.

Rent control comes in various forms, but generally sets a monthly or annual cap on the rent a landlord can charge their tenants, said Zev Yaroslavsky, director of the Los Angeles Initiative at the Luskin School of Public Affairs.

“It’s used to ensure the preservation of relatively affordable housing,” he said.

In the 1940s, rents were frozen by the federal government until more housing could be constructed in Los Angeles. In 1979, the Rent Stabilization Ordinance limited the percentage that rent could be increased on an annual basis.

Yaroslavsky, who contributed to the report, said the housing problems Los Angeles faces today are different than in years past because the affected socio-economic groups and geographic regions have changed.

“Today’s rent-burdened population is not a white middle-class population,” he said. “It is a low-income and middle-income population – people of color, people in south, east and central Los Angeles.”

The rent-burdened residents in Los Angeles face an unprecedented and dangerous combination of affordable housing shortfalls, rising rents and declining incomes, Yaroslavsky said.

The paper’s release comes a month before California residents will vote on Proposition 10, which, if passed, would loosen statewide restrictions on how cities implement rent-control policies.

Proposition 10 would repeal the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act, which prevents municipalities from enacting rent control on properties built after 1995, allows landlords to raise rent to market levels after a tenant moves out of a rent-controlled unit and forbids rent control from being applied to single-family homes and condos.

Some students at UCLA said they believe that the implementation of rent-control policies can have a positive impact on the housing security of the student population near campus and on economically vulnerable citizens citywide.

Karina Rodriguez, a first-year biology student, said she is in favor of passing Proposition 10 as her family has rented the same home for 17 years and has faced housing insecurity in years past. She said her family’s future in their home would be more secure if rent-control policies prevented the possibility of a rent increase.

Spencer Richard, a first-year mathematics student, said he thinks rent-control policies will give security to tenants in an unpredictable economy.

“When the economy is in flux, people will still have secure housing,” he said. “People can predict what their rent will cost them in the future.”

Trenisha Bennett, a fourth-year philosophy student who lives in an apartment in Westwood, said she is unhappy with what she is paying for housing, but is willing to pay it because she is focusing on school. She said she is in favor of a rent-control policy that ensures her rent does not go up dramatically.

“We may be students in Westwood, but we don’t have a ‘Westwood income,’” she said.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on Google+Share on Reddit

Comments are supposed to create a forum for thoughtful, respectful community discussion. Please be nice. View our full comments policy here.

  • Lolwut

    Is the DB staff not aware that the Luskin Center for History and Policy and the Luskin Conference Center are different entities? The photo for this article makes no sense.

  • Jasmine Zamora

    If Prop 10 passes, “People can predict what their rent will cost them in the future.” Indeed. Those who find a place to live will be able to predict.

    But those new students are not that lucky. If a rental unit cannot increase rent to market EVEN AFTER A STUDENT LEAVES, the landlord is stuck to the past forever. Some landlords may decide not to rent out at all. More new students will have to live farther away. For those unlucky new students of the future, Prop 10 has made their rents go d*mn higher.

  • Derek Lui

    I wonder what would happen if the author interviewed a single economics major.