Thursday, June 20

UCLA student leaders mobilize, advocate for new American DREAM

UCLA student leaders are advocating for a federal bill to provide permanent protections for undocumented individuals brought to the United States as children.

President Donald Trump announced in September the end of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which was enacted by former President Barack Obama in 2012. The program has helped thousands of undocumented individuals procure the documentation necessary to get jobs, open bank accounts and obtain driver’s licenses in certain states. On Tuesday, following a lawsuit from the University of California and other groups, a federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from ending the programs.

Chloe Pan, the UCLA Undergraduate Students Association Council external vice president, said she thinks Congress needs to pass a proposed bill called the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act, which would replace DACA and provide undocumented individuals with the legal status necessary to join the military or enter college.

The DREAM Act, first proposed in 2001, was voted down by Congress in 2010. Hiroshi Motomura, a professor of law specializing in immigration, said the Senate passed a more comprehensive immigration reform bill in 2013, but it did not become law because congressional leadership in the House of Representatives refused to allow a vote on it.

“You have not had a Republican leadership that has been willing to let the entire House of Representatives vote on (immigration reform),” Motomura said.

Motomura said he thinks Congress should pass legislation like the DREAM Act because DACA is a temporary solution protecting undocumented individuals who came to the United States as children.

“(DACA) didn’t really give anybody legal status, it just said that, ‘You are a low priority for deportation,’” he said.

Motomura said although polls show many Americans, including Republicans, support the DREAM Act, many lawmakers will support the bill only if it includes other provisions, such as increased border security.

“The unfortunate thing is that a lot of people who support it are unwilling to give up something they want if they don’t get something in return,” he said.

Several student leaders have participated in efforts to lobby lawmakers to support a clean version of the bill that is not conditional upon enacting other immigration policies, such as a border wall.

Pan and USAC Office of the External Vice President campus organizing director Christine Tran demonstrated in Washington, D.C. last month in support of the bill, and were briefly detained after holding a sit-in at Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s office. Following media coverage of the arrest, Feinstein voted against a stopgap spending bill to prevent a government shutdown because it did not provide protection for DACA recipients. The spending bill passed in the Senate 66-32 despite Feinstein’s vote against it.

“We sat down and said, ‘We’re here to stay until Sen. Feinstein promised to withhold her vote on a spending bill, unless it comes with a clean DREAM Act,’” Tran said.

Pan said she thinks it is important that any legislation to protect undocumented students not come with additional provisions, such as increased funding for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, because many DACA recipients have family members who are undocumented and are not protected by the program.

“It’s really important that when we talk about immigration reform, it’s done in a manner that doesn’t support young immigrants at the cost of realizing or criminalizing their parents,” she said.

Parshan Khosravi, Graduate Students Association vice president of external affairs, said he thinks student advocacy played an important role in convincing Feinstein to vote against the spending bill. He added he spent two days in November with the Asian American Pacific Islander DACA Collaborative in Washington, D.C. lobbying and demonstrating in support of the bill.

“It took (us) weeks and weeks of organizing to get (Feinstein) to say, ‘I’m going to stand behind DACA and the DREAM Act,’” he said. “It was five weeks of extensive action, taking over her offices.”

Tran said she thinks students’ large numbers will force politicians to listen to their concerns and support a DREAM Act.

“When students come together, politicians listen,” she said.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on Google+Share on Reddit
Opinion columnist

Mallett is an Opinion columnist.

Comments are supposed to create a forum for thoughtful, respectful community discussion. Please be nice. View our full comments policy here.

  • roccolore

    UCLA won’t protect Jewish students, but they’ll gladly support illegals.

  • DonHonda

    Is this what to expect from DREAMers?:

    Ruben Navarrette: One Dreamer’s missed lesson in good character

    And just who is the typical DREAMer?
    Research on Dreamers Contradicts Public Image

    ” 73 percent of DACA recipients he surveyed live in a low-income household (defined as qualifying for free lunch in high school);
    22 percent have earned a degree from a four-year college or university;
    20 percent have dropped out of high school;*
    20 percent have no education beyond high school and no plans to attend college;
    59 percent obtained a new job with a DACA work permit, but only 45 percent increased their overall earnings; and
    36 percent have a parent who holds a bachelor’s degree.”
    Don’t buy into all of that rosy PR about DACA
    Ruben Navarette: Dreamers: Don’t let Dems fool you

    “Dreamers, this is your wake-up call. Democrats want you to think they’re in your corner. But it’s not so.

    The Democrats failed you. Don’t let them fool you.”

  • Vince Tagliano

    Should the parents of the Dreamers be allowed to stay? Absolutely not. They knowingly violated our laws.

  • sandings

    Article wording needs correcting. The DACAs are illegal aliens ages 20-36 and in direct competition for jobs with the US millennials.
    Are these college student DACAs also representing these DACAs:
    A recent study by a Harvard University researcher found that 22
    percent of DACA recipients have earned a bachelors degree compared to
    the 32 percent of native-born U.S. citizens. Disturbingly, the study
    also found that 21 percent of DACA recipients have dropped out of high
    school, a rate four times higher than the national dropout rate.
    From the Daily Signal -
    had no requirement of English fluency either. In fact, the original
    application requested applicants to answer whether the form had been
    “read” to the alien by a translator “in a language in which [the
    applicant is] fluent.”
    The Center for Immigration Studies estimates
    that “perhaps 24 percent of the DACA-eligible population fall into the
    functionally illiterate category and another 46 percent have only
    ‘basic’ English ability.”