Thursday, April 25

Submission: Block’s stance on ethics statement concerns Armenian community


Editor’s note: A version of this article originally appeared on the Armenian Chronicles blog.

Many Armenian Bruins and alumni feel that the email statement Chancellor Gene Block sent to the campus on May 16 does not meaningfully participate with the reality of the Joint Statement of Undergraduate Students Association Council Ethics circulated among student government candidates.

The issue is accountability for members of student government, as well as preventing the Armenian community from coming under attack by external lobbying organizations, namely from the Republic of Turkey, which is heavily invested in the historical revisionism of the Armenian genocide, and from the Republic of Azerbaijan, which denies the self-determination of the Armenian people of Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh) and promotes anti-Armenian hate speech on a national level.

Students and organizations, including the Armenian Students’ Association, asked USAC candidates to pledge not to take free trips from lobbying organizations that marginalize students. The original statement asserted that representatives should not accept gifts from any non-student organization with a history of discrimination based on race, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, etc.

Former councilmember Sunny Singh accepted a free trip by the Anti-Defamation League, an organization that is on the record as opposing the United States’ recognition of the Armenian genocide.

Armenian students also raised concerns earlier this year about a councilmember accepting a free trip to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee Policy Conference. During this year’s conference, Azerbaijani Ambassador Elin Suleymanov spoke at the “New Allies: Israel and the Caucasus Region” panel and later engaged UCLA students in a closed-door meeting where he discussed Armenian-Azeri issues.

Armenian Bruins were extremely concerned that any organization calling itself credible would give a platform to Suleymanov, who represents a country that in 2012 added to its egregious human rights record by extraditing Azerbaijani Lt. Ramil Safarov. Safarov was serving a life sentence for axe-murdering Gurgen Margaryan, an Armenian officer, in his sleep during a NATO program. Azerbaijan’s government pardoned him of his life sentence and greeted him as a national hero. Bruins at this conference, ignorant of this political context, took pictures with Suleymanov and praised him via social media. After this sensitive issue was brought up at a council meeting during winter quarter, the councilmember asserted that it was within his right to attend such a conference on his own time while in office.

Block’s blanket statement that these trips are only educational in nature concerns Armenian Bruins. If we are to allow external political lobbies for foreign governments to buy free trips to parts of the world for our elected student government representatives, the door is wide open for the Armenian community to be targeted and attacked.

The Turkish and Azerbaijani lobbies (which in fact work closely with lobbies already criticized in the ethics statement) are throwing money at elected legislative representatives on a local, state and national level, and have historically turned the campus into political battlegrounds.

Most recently, a Tennessee news station discovered that a lawmaker introduced an anti-Armenian bill just two weeks after receiving $10,000 in campaign contributions from donors with ties to the Azerbaijani community.

In 2011, then-Rep. Jean Schmidt (R-Ohio) was accused of accepting “blood money” from the Turkish government in return for her opposition of a bill recognizing Armenian genocide.

In the late 1990s, Armenian UCLA students successfully brought about the rejection of an agreement signed between the international studies department and the Turkish Foundation, an arm of the Turkish government, which included a $1 million endowment for the establishment of a chair in Ottoman and Turkish studies, out of fear that money from foreign governments may facilitate the revision of history.

In light of all these political realities, Armenian Bruins are extremely sensitive to any perceived conflicts of interest from any of their elected representatives. This sensitivity is no different on the student government council table, which is why we demand elected representatives be held accountable for their actions.

The events that have transpired on the council table this year around conflicts of interest are an embarrassment to this campus community. No elected councilmembers should receive a free trip anywhere while they are representing students unless it is directly for advocacy on student issues. There should be nothing controversial about that.

Block’s email leaves Armenian students on this campus feeling uneasy about his commitment to accountability, or any of these crucial issues for the Armenian cause, which have been upheld by the California Assembly when it officially recognized the state of Artsakh and encouraged the implementation of Armenian genocide education in its state curriculum.

The Armenian Students’ Association demands Block reaffirm his commitment to the accountability of students by students. The Armenian Students’ Association further demands that Block recognize the self-determination of the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh and reaffirm his commitment to the recognition of the Armenian genocide by the United States of America.

Kalbakian is the vice president of the Armenian Students Association at UCLA and a second-year political science student. Joukhajian is the political activism chair of the Armenian Students Association and a fourth-year philosophy student. Sarkissian is an alumnus and the former president of the Armenian Students Association.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on Google+Share on Reddit

Comments are supposed to create a forum for thoughtful, respectful community discussion. Please be nice. View our full comments policy here.

  • David

    By criticizing the problematic ethics statement–which was clearly written with the intent of exclusively targeting Israel, despite a vaguely worded attempt to make the statement broadly applicable–Chancellor Block in no way affirmed any sort of official support for any of the organizations blacklisted by the statement. Defending constitutionally-protected free speech and freedom of association does not warrant this aggressive criticism.

    This is a non-issue; Chancellor Block did not in any way, shape, or form implicitly or explicitly state any form of support for the “marginalization” of Armenians or any other group of students, denial of the Armenian genocide, or denial of the right to self-determination of the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh.

    Concerns related to Armenian genocide denial and other issues addressed in this submission are absolutely valid, but not in this context. They are quite simply inapplicable here, and ASA should show some tact by rescinding this rude and unfounded

    • Whatever

      You are 100% correct. Block’s statement was perfect and reminded people to uphold civility. Unfortunate Armenians can’t realize this. As a man who cares deeply about women, I was highly concerned when Armenians flocked to the rescue of rapist Hakop Kaplanyan.

      The world does not revolve around Glendale, CA and this Armenian Association was being hyper-sensitive. Cheap way to gain publicity.

      • Kal

        ^ This an incredibly racist statement. In addition Hakop is an alleged rapist who garnered some support from the Armenian community in his defense, nothing big, the whole of Glendale did not flock to his rescue as you have stated. Think before you type.

        • Razmig Sarkissian

          Agreed. The Armenian community is diverse and full of a multitude of opinions and viewpoints, we are not a monolithic community, and neither are Palestinians, Muslims or Jews.

          • David

            The point at hand is that the ethics statement is inherently problematic, and not so “ethical.” It seeks to undermine freedom of speech and silence particular viewpoints, both of which are absolutely unacceptable at any university and show a lack of respect and understanding for constitutionally-protected rights. Those who continue to stubbornly support the “ethics statement” for whatever reason should reevaluate the Chancellor’s advice, even if that means swallowing some of their pride.

  • ThisIsPalestine

    Perhaps the Armenian community shouldn’t be signing on with a racist and anti-Semitic movement determined to squelch freedom of speech at UCLA. Just saying.

    By the way, I’m pretty sure SJP doesn’t recognize the Armenian Genocide either, as that would implicate their Muslim “brothers” in Turkey. So spare us the never ending hypocrisy.

    • Razmig Sarkissian

      Lol Students for Justice in Palestine, Jewish Voice for Peace and the Armenian Students’ Association have been working on this together…your statement is not only insanely Islamaphobic and overgeneralizing, but also factually incorrect :)

      • Whatever

        Islamophobic a word created by fascists used by cowards to manipulate morons (like Razmig Sarkissian).

        • Elon

          I’m actually not sure it is. I did a search through the archives to see if SJP ever addressed Armenia-Turkey, and they have not.

  • gr8vision

    Nagorno-Karabakh is actually a region of Azerbaijan that is illegally occupied by Armenia, where Armenian army, with Russian help, committed massive human rights violations, including the largest massacre of the time in Khojaly, and ethnically cleansed the entire Azerbaijani population from these now occupied lands. For a detailed factsheet: http://Karabakh.usazeris.org

    • Elon

      Both Armenia and Azerbaijan committed massive human rights violations there, but yes, the ASA are slightly hypocritical.

  • ETF

    ASA seems to trying to break a record for sanctimonious posturing, replete with hyperbole and non-sequitur. Yawn