Wednesday, June 20

Editorial: Plans to enact lasting changes key for USAC candidates


As the undergraduate student government candidates develop their platforms for the approaching election, this board urges them not to focus on event planning and instead work toward instituting systemic change that will continue to benefit the student population in future years.

In recent years, many candidates have presented vague platforms that attempt to solve campus issues by planning informational events.

Although programming is necessary for campus vitality, these events usually have minimal lasting impact.

A quick glance at the platforms proposed by current councilmembers in the spring 2012 elections shows an over-reliance on events. For example, a multitude of forums were organized but sparsely attended throughout the year.

The most effective changes made by the Undergraduate Students Association Council in recent years have been those instituting programs that combat specific issues around UCLA and the Westwood community.

For example, three years ago, the internal vice president’s office coordinated with UCLA’s Community Service Officer program to set up Strathmore Safe Rides, which transports students across Westwood on Thursday nights.

A former financial supports commissioner worked with Associated Students UCLA to improve the rates of the textbook buyback program in Ackerman Union, a concrete benefit that worked to help student finances.

These programs are examples of changes USAC has made that will provide tangible resources for future students.

It is understandable that, at this point in the election process, the candidates are still fleshing out their platforms.

But candidates should keep in mind that many plans, whether they be event-based or institutional, often get sidetracked or canceled because of a lack of logistical foresight on the part of the councilmember. One such example was a failed plan to revitalize Sunset Recreation through a proposed music festival, which did not take into account fire codes in the buildings.

Candidates can set themselves apart in this contested election cycle by immediately starting to contact the appropriate external parties to assess the feasibility of long-lasting proposals that require more legwork.

This is not to say that informational events could not be of service. The community can benefit from forums addressing issues perpetually confronting the student body, such as keeping the undergraduate government more transparent, monitoring the campus climate, encouraging diversity and maintaining campus safety.

However, candidates should aim higher than that. This board would like to see future councilmembers that are looking to enact meaningful and enduring change, with research to back their platforms.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on Google+Share on Reddit

Comments are supposed to create a forum for thoughtful, respectful community discussion. Please be nice. View our full comments policy here.

  • Really?

    Duh

  • Active Bruin Tired of Inaction

    Yes!!!! Some people can’t conceive institutional change because its not a priority to them like the cute seat on the council is.

  • Fixing our campus thru BU

    The only candidates for gen rep that will really make a difference are Avi, Sunny, and Sam!! Just vote BU, it’s the only way to go!

    • Jason Smith

      This is a very sweeping statement **side eyes**

      • Carly for Prez!

        I don’t think that’s completely true. Look at all of the change that Carly made as a Gen Rep. BU is the best way to go. I’m definitely voting Carly!

        • Locke

          Ummm this seems like online campaigning… Carly and her supporters can’t campaign for another 15 hours or so…