Tuesday, October 22

UCLA administration, UCPD discuss security cameras policy with students


Administrators, including Administrative Vice Chancellor Michael Beck (pictured) answered questions about a new surveillance camera policy at a Campus Safety Alliance meeting Thursday. 
CSA is a student government organization which aims to increase student input on safety issues. (Ashley Kenney/Daily Bruin)

Administrators, including Administrative Vice Chancellor Michael Beck (pictured) answered questions about a new surveillance camera policy at a Campus Safety Alliance meeting Thursday. CSA is a student government organization which aims to increase student input on safety issues. (Ashley Kenney/Daily Bruin)


Students met with representatives from the UCLA administration and UCPD to discuss students’ concerns of increased surveillance on campus.

Administrators, including Administrative Vice Chancellor Michael Beck and Assistant Vice Chancellor Mick Deluca, answered questions about UCLA Policy 133 at a Campus Safety Alliance meeting Thursday. UCLA Policy 133, which aims to regulate security camera use, has been met with student concern since its announcement in September.

The Campus Safety Alliance, a student government organization which aims to increase student input in safety issues, wanted to give administrators and UCPD the chance to address students’ concerns about the policy, said Robert Blake Watson, the Undergraduate Students Association Council internal vice president.

Policy 133 aims to centralize and standardize the collection of data via video cameras that are already installed across the UCLA campus. It would also give UCPD direct access to these security cameras.

Beck said current regulations do not provide standardized rules for all of the cameras on campus.

“We have probably something between 2,500 and 3,500 cameras on campus that exist today, and there is no governing policy associated with how they can and should be used,” Beck said.

UCPD Lt. Kevin Kilgore said the department currently has access to about 10 of these cameras.

Beck added the policy mandates a 90-day maximum for anyone to hold or access the footage.

Some students said they were concerned about how the camera policy might be abused in the future. One student specifically asked whether or not the university had plans to add facial recognition software to the current security system.

While the policy does not allow facial recognition software today, Beck said he thinks the university may be interested in adopting such a measure in the future.

“There is a specific interest in being able to do that for people who have a stay-away order or who shouldn’t be on campus for a legitimate reason why they shouldn’t be here,” Beck said. “There is discussion about that, but we decided that needs to be the next chapter.”

Students said they were concerned by what they see as a lack of student input on the policy.

Matthew William Richard, a CSA coordinator and a second-year political science student, said he thinks the administration should involve students more in the decision-making process.

Watson said he thinks the administration is trying to reach out to students by sending representatives to CS meetings, but they could do a better job at reaching out to more students.

“I think that’s a great first step,” Watson said. “Obviously there can always be more outreach to students.”

Beck said the administration plans on being more aggressive in its attempts to reach students before they make decisions about future policies. The administration held a mandatory period for students to comment on the policy, and Beck claims that the policy was also sent to the Associated Students UCLA and Graduate Students Association leadership.

Richard said he thinks it was good to hear Beck talk about the new policy because it helped him to further analyze it.

“I think it was very good to hear Michael Beck speak about the policy because it gives you a new lens into it and how it really centralizes the system,” Richard said.

UCLA plans to implement Policy 133 by December 2020. Any camera which fails to comply with Policy 133 will be turned off at that time.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterEmail this to someoneShare on Google+Share on Reddit

Comments are supposed to create a forum for thoughtful, respectful community discussion. Please be nice. View our full comments policy here.