Thursday, March 28, 2024

AdvertiseDonateSubmit
NewsSportsArtsOpinionThe QuadPhotoVideoIllustrationsCartoonsGraphicsThe StackPRIMEEnterpriseInteractivesPodcastsBruinwalkClassifieds

Regents to discuss admissions policy

By Daily Bruin Staff

March 13, 1996 9:00 p.m.

Regents to discuss admissions policy

By Michael Howerton

Daily Bruin Staff

Despite their efforts to move past the mire of affirmative
action, the UC Board of Regents will meet today to discuss and vote
on the future of admissions and hiring practices at the
university.

One proposal, by Alumni Regent Judith Levin, would set a
one-year postponement on the regents’ repeal of affirmative action
so that faculty could add their input to the process. The other
proposal, by Student Regent Ed Gomez, seeks to overturn the July
decision and keep affirmative action at the university.

Both proposals came before the board at the January meeting, but
they were both postponed until this month’s meeting.

"Ed and I are the conscience of the board, reminding them that
this issue is not going away like they want it to," Levin said.

"I hope (the other regents) see our proposals and say ‘uh oh,
here we go again,’" she added. "They did not go about this in the
right way."

One of the reasons her measure was postponed at the January
meeting was that Levin suspected she did not have enough votes in
her favor. However, with the retirement of two of the most
conservative members of the board last month, the distribution of
votes might fall more evenly this time, Levin said.

But more than trying to overturn the board’s decision last July,
Levin said her proposal is an attempt to get the board to
acknowledge that they made a mistake by not consulting the faculty
in their decision.

The long standing university tradition of shared governance, in
which the regents have deferred to the faculty on all past
admission policy decisions, was violated when the regents decided
to end affirmative action policies without consulting the faculty,
Levin said.

"More than affirmative action, I want to bring attention to
shared governance," Levin said. "The Board of Regents needs to be
reminded on a continuous basis that they need to honor the
philosophy of shared governance. They need a little tickle."

The California Civil Rights Initiative (CCRI), if passed in
November, will make the regent’s decision obsolete, Regents Chair
Claire Burgener said.

He downplayed the importance of today’s discussion in San
Francisco.

The discussion at the meeting today will be minimal, he
speculated, since the California Civil Rights Initiative, which
probably has enough signatures to qualify for the ballot, will put
the issue in the hands of the voters.

"There really isn’t much point (to the proposals)," Burgener
said. Even if one of the proposals passes, he said it would not
affect the implementation.

Since the language of the intiative would eliminate any public
hiring and contracting policies that were in any way determined by
race or gender, the university would be under its mandate if it
passes.

"We’re waiting for the public to give us consul and advice,"
Burgener said.

If the public votes down the bill in November, he said, then the
board will be under heavy pressure to repeal their elimination of
affirmative action. If the bill passes, then the regents would be
forced to eliminate affirmative action practices, he added.

In light of the initiative, Levin said it was even more
important to heal the schism between the faculty and the
regents.

"If we are stuck with CCRI, I would like to see accord between
the regents and the faculty so we can deal with that," Levin
said.

Comments to [email protected]

Share this story:FacebookTwitterRedditEmail
COMMENTS
Featured Classifieds
More classifieds »
Related Posts